Kotak Gold Fund vs Mirae Asset NYSE FANG + ETF Fund of Fund
Put two or three funds side by side — returns, risk, what they cost and what they actually hold. Figures are for the Direct plan, Growth option, where a fund has one.
| Fund | ||
|---|---|---|
| Returns | ||
| 1 year | 38.2% | 47.1% (best of these funds) |
| 3 yearsa year | 35.8% | 56.8% (best of these funds) |
| 5 yearsa year | 25.5% | 35.5% (best of these funds) |
| 10 yearsa year | 16.5% | – |
| Risk | ||
| Volatilitya year | 21.6% (best of these funds) | 26.4% |
| Worst fall | −24.1% (best of these funds) | −43.7% |
| Best year | 113.6% (best of these funds) | 104.3% |
| Worst year | -17% (best of these funds) | -41.5% |
| Years in gain | 89% (best of these funds) | 79% |
| Cost and size | ||
| Expense ratio | 0.66% | 0.58% (best of these funds) |
| Fund size | ₹7,195 Cr | ₹2,707 Cr |
| Minimum SIP | ₹100 | – |
| Lock-in | None | None |
Returns beyond a year are annualised. The stronger figure in each row is marked, which is not a recommendation: a fund that returned more usually took more risk to do it.
Mutual fund investments are subject to market risks; read all scheme-related documents carefully. Past performance does not guarantee future returns. This page is for information only and is not a recommendation to buy or sell.