Skip to content
SmartFigure

Two funds walk into a table. Only the numbers talk.

WhiteOak Capital Aggressive Hybrid Fund vs Bandhan Aggressive Hybrid Fund

Pick two or three funds. We’ll tell you in plain words which grew faster, which was calmer, which costs less and what your money would have become. Figures are for the Direct plan, Growth option, where a fund has one.

  • WhiteOak Capital Aggressive Hybrid Fund
  • Bandhan Aggressive Hybrid Fund

The short version

Who comes out ahead on each measure.

  • Fell less in a crash

    No fair winner yet

    At its worst, WhiteOak Capital Aggressive Hybrid Fund fell 5.7% from its peak, against 31.5% for Bandhan Aggressive Hybrid Fund. On ₹1 lakh, that's a dip to ₹68,454 at the bottom for Bandhan Aggressive Hybrid Fund. Could you have held on?

    Not a fair fight: we only have data for WhiteOak Capital Aggressive Hybrid Fund (from Jul 2026), so it has not been through the 2020 crash the others fell in.

  • Costs less

    BBandhan Aggressive Hybrid Fund

    Bandhan Aggressive Hybrid Fund charges 0.88% a year, against 1.35% for WhiteOak Capital Aggressive Hybrid Fund. On ₹1 lakh that's ₹880 a year against ₹1,350, taken quietly from the NAV.

What your money would have become

The same amount, put into each fund on the same day.

Not enough shared history to chart these funds together yet.

Strengths and watch-outs

Each fund judged against its own category, and against a 5-year SBI FD at 6.05%.

AWhiteOak Capital Aggressive Hybrid Fund

  • Watch out: Less than 3 years of history, too short to judge

BBandhan Aggressive Hybrid Fund

  • Strength: Ahead of its category: 12.1% a year over 5 years, against a category average of 10.2%
  • Strength: In the top quarter of its category over 5 years (#5 of 26)
  • Strength: Beat a 5-year SBI FD: 12.1% a year over 5 years, against 6.05%
  • Watch out: Fell harder than its category in the worst crash

All the numbers

The stronger figure in each row is marked Best. Under each return is the fund’s rank in its category and the category average.

WhiteOak Capital Aggressive Hybrid Fund compared with Bandhan Aggressive Hybrid Fund
MeasureAWhiteOak Capital Aggressive Hybrid FundBBandhan Aggressive Hybrid Fund
ReturnsHow much the fund grew. Beyond a year, this is per year (annualised).
1 yearLast 12 months, the most noisy figure–9.1%#3 of 29 · avg 3.2%
3 yearsPer year, over a full market mood swing–16.2%#1 of 29 · avg 12.2%
5 yearsPer year, the fairest single test–12.1%#5 of 26 · avg 10.2%
RiskHow bumpy the ride was. This is what decides whether you stay invested.
Ups and downsVolatility: how far it swings in a typical year. Lower is calmer–12%category avg 11.1%
Worst fallThe biggest drop from a peak in 10 years. Lower is better−5.7%data from 1 Jul 2026 only−31.5%category avg −27.6%
Best 12 monthsIts strongest year–74.4%
Worst 12 monthsIts weakest year–-26.6%
Odds of a gainShare of all 1-year holding periods that ended in profit–86%
Cost and sizeThe fee comes out of your returns every year, whether the fund does well or not.
Expense ratioYearly fee. Lower keeps more for you1.35%0.88%Best
Fund sizeMoney managed (AUM). Neither better nor worse₹594 Cr₹2,663 Cr
Minimum SIPSmallest monthly amount₹100₹100
Lock-inTime before you can withdrawNoneNone

“Best” is not a recommendation: a fund that returned more usually took more risk to do it.

Which one fits you?

There is no best fund, only a better fit for what you need the money to do.

AWhiteOak Capital Aggressive Hybrid Fund

Might suit you if…

  • you prefer its fund house or approach. On these numbers it is not the stand-out on any one measure

BBandhan Aggressive Hybrid Fund

Might suit you if…

  • you care about keeping costs low, which adds up over decades