LIC MF Value Fund vs Quant Value Fund
Put two or three funds side by side — returns, risk, what they cost and what they actually hold. Figures are for the Direct plan, Growth option, where a fund has one.
| Fund | ||
|---|---|---|
| Returns | ||
| 1 year | 19.3% (best of these funds) | 15.3% |
| 3 yearsa year | 17% | 20.6% (best of these funds) |
| Risk | ||
| Volatilitya year | 17.2% (best of these funds) | 18.8% |
| Worst fall | −25.2% | −24% (best of these funds) |
| Best year | 47.6% | 84% (best of these funds) |
| Worst year | -11% (best of these funds) | -14% |
| Years in gain | 73% | 80% (best of these funds) |
| Cost and size | ||
| Expense ratio | 1.84% | 0.92% (best of these funds) |
| Fund size | ₹302 Cr | ₹1,978 Cr |
| Minimum SIP | ₹200 (best of these funds) | ₹1,000 |
| Lock-in | None | None |
Returns beyond a year are annualised. The stronger figure in each row is marked, which is not a recommendation: a fund that returned more usually took more risk to do it.
Mutual fund investments are subject to market risks; read all scheme-related documents carefully. Past performance does not guarantee future returns. This page is for information only and is not a recommendation to buy or sell.